Bun vs Deno
Bun versus Deno: JavaScript runtime performance, Node.js compatibility, built-in tooling, ecosystem, and which fits your modern backend stack.
A Rust-core, all-in-one fast JS/TS runtime
The enterprise-grade JavaScript runtime standard since 2009
There's no single answer, but there is a clear decision framework. If you're writing a new HTTP service with pure JS/TS dependencies and you want speed plus integrated tooling, Bun 1.4 is now a serious option — passing 1,517 tests against Node 26.3.0 compatibility backs that up. But if you depend on native N-API modules (sharp, native bcrypt, some DB drivers), or you run a long-lived enterprise SSR/API system, Node 24 LTS's 30-month official support commitment and massive native-module ecosystem is still the safer default. A hybrid within the same project — "Bun for tooling (install/test/build), Node for the production runtime" — is also a legitimate and increasingly common approach, since it lowers the risk of gradual adoption. Base your decision not on synthetic "req/s" numbers, but on testing your own dependency list with `bun install` against your real load profile.
| Category | Bun 1.4 | Node.js 26 / 24 LTS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 9/10 | 7/10 |
| Ease of Learning | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Ecosystem | 6/10 | 10/10 |
| Community | 6/10 | 10/10 |
| Job Market | 5/10 | 10/10 |
| Future-Proof | 8/10 | 9/10 |
// Bun 1.4 — HTTP/2-enabled native server (Bun.serve) + built-in SQL client
// bun run server.ts runs TypeScript directly, no transpile step needed
import { SQL } from "bun";
// Bun's built-in SQL client: queries are written as tagged templates
const db = new SQL(process.env.DATABASE_URL!);
const server = Bun.serve({
port: 3000,
// Since Bun v1.4.1, Bun.serve supports native HTTP/2
http2: true,
async fetch(req: Request): Promise<Response> {
const url = new URL(req.url);
if (url.pathname === "/api/users" && req.method === "GET") {
const users = await db`SELECT id, name FROM users LIMIT 20`;
return Response.json(users);
}
if (url.pathname === "/api/upload" && req.method === "POST") {
const body = await req.formData();
const file = body.get("file") as File;
// Bun.write streams to disk, no extra buffer copy needed
await Bun.write(`./uploads/${file.name}`, file);
return Response.json({ ok: true, size: file.size });
}
return new Response("Not Found", { status: 404 });
},
});
console.log(`Bun server listening on port ${server.port} (HTTP/2 enabled)`);
// Install dependencies with bun install — produces npm-compatible node_modules
// $ bun install
// $ bun test
// $ bun build ./server.ts --outdir ./dist --target bun// Node.js 24 LTS — direct TS via native http module + type-stripping
// Type stripping default since v23.6.0/v22.18.0, stable since v25.2.0/v24.12.0: only "erasable syntax" TS support
// node server.ts (runs flag-free on 24.12+ and 26.x; use --no-strip-types to disable)
import { createServer } from "node:http";
import { readFile, writeFile } from "node:fs/promises";
import { Pool } from "pg";
const pool = new Pool({ connectionString: process.env.DATABASE_URL });
const server = createServer(async (req, res) => {
const url = new URL(req.url ?? "/", `http://${req.headers.host}`);
if (url.pathname === "/api/users" && req.method === "GET") {
const result = await pool.query("SELECT id, name FROM users LIMIT 20");
res.writeHead(200, { "Content-Type": "application/json" });
res.end(JSON.stringify(result.rows));
return;
}
if (url.pathname === "/api/report" && req.method === "GET") {
// Run CPU-intensive work with worker_threads without blocking the main thread
const { Worker } = await import("node:worker_threads");
const worker = new Worker("./report-worker.js");
worker.once("message", (report) => {
res.writeHead(200, { "Content-Type": "application/json" });
res.end(JSON.stringify(report));
});
return;
}
res.writeHead(404);
res.end("Not Found");
});
server.listen(3000, () => {
console.log("Node.js server listening on port 3000");
});
// Install dependencies with npm install
// $ npm install
// $ node --testThere's no single answer, but there is a clear decision framework. If you're writing a new HTTP service with pure JS/TS dependencies and you want speed plus integrated tooling, Bun 1.4 is now a serious option — passing 1,517 tests against Node 26.3.0 compatibility backs that up. But if you depend on native N-API modules (sharp, native bcrypt, some DB drivers), or you run a long-lived enterprise SSR/API system, Node 24 LTS's 30-month official support commitment and massive native-module ecosystem is still the safer default. A hybrid within the same project — "Bun for tooling (install/test/build), Node for the production runtime" — is also a legitimate and increasingly common approach, since it lowers the risk of gradual adoption. Base your decision not on synthetic "req/s" numbers, but on testing your own dependency list with `bun install` against your real load profile.
Get Free ConsultationFor most HTTP APIs/web services, yes — Bun 1.4 passed 1,517 new tests in the Node.js 26.3.0 compatibility suite, and frameworks like Express/Fastify/Next.js run without issue. But if you depend on native N-API addons (sharp, native bcrypt) or run long-lived processes that stay up 72+ hours, Node's V8-based GC behavior is still more proven. Short answer: a new service with pure JS dependencies fits Bun; an old or native-heavy system fits Node.